Multi-Cloud Streaming: Avoiding Vendor Lock-In

Multi-Cloud Streaming: Avoiding Vendor Lock-In

Multi-Cloud Streaming: Avoiding Vendor Lock-In

Cloud-specific streaming services (Kinesis, Dataflow, Stream Analytics) create vendor lock-in. A multi-cloud streaming architecture uses open-source tools — Apache Kafka (or Redpanda) for messaging and RisingWave for processing — that run identically on any cloud or on-premise.

Multi-Cloud Streaming Architecture

Any Cloud / On-Premise
├── Kafka or Redpanda (event streaming)
├── RisingWave (stream processing + serving)
├── Apache Iceberg on S3/GCS/ADLS (storage)
└── Trino or DuckDB (analytical queries)

Lock-In Assessment

ComponentLocked-In OptionOpen Alternative
MessagingKinesis, Pub/Sub, Event HubsKafka, Redpanda, Pulsar
ProcessingDataflow, Managed Flink, Stream AnalyticsRisingWave, Flink (self-hosted)
StorageRedshift, BigQueryIceberg on S3/GCS
ServingDynamoDB, BigtableRisingWave (built-in PG)

Why Open Source for Streaming

  1. Portability: Same stack works on AWS, GCP, Azure, or on-premise
  2. Cost control: No vendor markup on compute/storage
  3. Negotiation leverage: Can migrate if pricing changes
  4. Regulatory compliance: Data stays in your infrastructure

Frequently Asked Questions

Is multi-cloud streaming more expensive?

Not necessarily. You lose managed service convenience but gain negotiation leverage and avoid vendor markup. Self-hosted open source on EC2/GCE/Azure VMs is often 50-70% cheaper than equivalent managed services.

Which open-source tools should I use for multi-cloud streaming?

Kafka or Redpanda for messaging. RisingWave for stream processing + serving (PostgreSQL-compatible, S3 state). Apache Iceberg for storage (works on S3, GCS, ADLS). Trino or DuckDB for analytical queries.

Best-in-Class Event Streaming
for Agents, Apps, and Analytics
GitHubXLinkedInSlackYouTube
Sign up for our to stay updated.