Explore the differences between Apache Hudi and Apache Iceberg in this comprehensive comparison. Learn about their unique features and capabilities for modern data architecture.
In the ever-evolving landscape of data storage and processing, the concept of data lakehouses has emerged as a game-changer. Combining the best elements of data warehouses and data lakes, a data lakehouse provides a unified platform that supports various critical functions such as data science, business intelligence, AI/ML, and ad hoc reporting. This innovative approach not only facilitates real-time analytics but also significantly reduces platform costs, enhances data governance, and accelerates use cases.
The evolution of data storage and processing has led to the development of modern analytical platforms known as data lakehouses. These platforms are designed to address the limitations of traditional architectures by offering enhanced capabilities for managing and analyzing vast volumes of diverse data types. As a result, chief data officers and CIOs are increasingly recognizing the value of investing in modernizing their analytical platforms to leverage the benefits offered by data lakehouse technologies.
Metadata layers play a crucial role in enabling key features common in data lakehouses such as support for streaming I/O, time travel to old table versions, schema enforcement and evolution, as well as data validation. The performance optimization techniques employed by these platforms include caching hot data in RAM/SSDs, clustering co-accessed data for efficient access, using auxiliary structures like statistics and indexes, and employing vectorized execution on modern CPUs. Furthermore, open formats like Parquet make it easy for data scientists and machine learning engineers to access the rich pool of information within a lakehouse using popular tools from the DS/ML ecosystem such as pandas, TensorFlow, PyTorch, among others.
Gartner's Ronthal views the transition from traditional lakes to modern lakehouses as an inevitable trend with significant potential benefits for organizations seeking advanced analytics capabilities. This shift is driven by the need for improved production capabilities which were often lacking in traditional lakes.
The role played by Apache Hudi and Apache Iceberg in modern data architecture is pivotal due to their unique capabilities that cater to different aspects of managing and analyzing large-scale datasets within a lakehouse environment.
Apache Hudi is renowned for its record-level insertions, updates, deletes capabilities along with its timeline-based approach to managing data snapshots at different points in time. On the other hand,
Apache Iceberg excels at providing fast, efficient, reliable solutions at any scale while maintaining records of dataset changes over time.
These two open-source technologies have become integral components within modern-day lakehouses due to their ability to offer flexibility, real-time processing, cost-effectiveness, and scalability over traditional architectures.
Apache Hudi, an open-source data management framework, has emerged as a pivotal solution for high-performance and scalable data ingestion, storage, and processing. It was developed by Uber in 2016 to address specific challenges in handling large-scale data lakes. Apache Hudi stands out for its ability to balance performance, scalability, and data consistency, making it a compelling choice for organizations looking to optimize and standardize their data pipelines.
The genesis of Apache Hudi can be traced back to its origin at Uber, where it was conceptualized and developed to revolutionize the efficiency of updates and deletes in columnar file formats like Parquet and ORC. Its primary focus on optimizing the efficiency of these operations makes it a standout player in the realm of data lakehouse technologies. Moreover, Apache Hudi is designed with a strong emphasis on compatibility and integration with existing big data tools and platforms. This design philosophy enables seamless incremental data processing and pipeline development while ensuring robust management at the record-level within Amazon S3 data lakes.
One of the most powerful characteristics of Apache Hudi is its ability to handle streaming data in a data analytical environment while ensuring data integrity and enabling real-time analytics. Furthermore, it brings core warehouse and database functionality directly to a data lake, reimagining slow old-school batch data processing with a powerful new incremental processing framework for low latency minute-level analytics. This unique capability positions Apache Hudias an indispensable tool for organizations seeking real-time access to updated data using familiar tools within their existing ecosystem.
Apache Hudi excels in facilitating real-time data processing by providing a transactional platform that brings database and warehouse capabilities to the data lake environment. This feature is particularly beneficial for organizations requiring minute-level analytics with low latency.
Another key strength of Apache Hudi lies in its efficient handling of incremental data processing and indexing. By simplifying these processes within the context of a modern lakehouse architecture, it enables organizations to manage their ever-growing datasets more effectively while maintaining high performance standards.
Apache Iceberg, a distributed and community-driven open-source data table format, has emerged as a pivotal solution for simplifying data processing on large datasets stored in data lakes. It offers seamless integrations with popular data processing frameworks such as Apache Spark, Apache Flink, Apache Hive, PrestoDB, and more. This 100% open-source format is designed to handle large datasets efficiently, optimize query performance, and ensure data consistency and reliability through its support for transactions.
The origins of Apache Iceberg can be traced back to Netflix, where it was developed to address the challenges associated with processing and managing massive volumes of data within their cloud infrastructure. Over time, it has evolved into a robust solution that provides core features and advantages essential for modern lakehouse architectures.
Apache Iceberg tables are increasingly becoming the preferred choice for data lakes due to their scalability, performance, ACID transactions, schema evolution, and time travel capabilities. These tables seamlessly integrate with compute engines including Spark, Trino, PrestoDB, Flink, Hive, and Impala using a high-performance table format that works just like a SQL table.
One of the key strengths of Apache Iceberg lies in its ability to optimize query performance on large-scale datasets. By leveraging its efficient table format, it ensures that queries are executed with high performance while maintaining data consistency and reliability.
Another critical advantage offered by Apache Iceberg is its capability to handle large-scale data seamlessly. This feature is particularly beneficial for organizations dealing with massive volumes of diverse data types within their lakehouse environments.
When comparing Apache Hudi and Apache Iceberg, it becomes evident that both technologies offer unique features and advantages that cater to different aspects of managing and analyzing large-scale datasets within a lakehouse environment. Let's delve into a detailed feature comparison to understand their respective strengths.
Apache Hudi stands out for its ability to balance performance, scalability, and data consistency, making it a compelling choice for organizations looking to optimize and standardize their data pipelines. The most powerful characteristic of Apache Hudi is its ability to deal with streaming data in a data analytical environment while ensuring data integrity and enabling real-time analytics. On the other hand, Apache Iceberg is an open table format for huge analytic datasets. It adds tables to compute engines including Spark, Trino, PrestoDB, Flink, Hive, and Impala using a high-performance table format that works just like a SQL table. Both technologies provide ACID transactions on large-scale SQL tables and are compatible with various query engines like Apache Hive and Presto.
In terms of data processing and query performance, Apache Hudi's ability to handle both batch and real-time data processing, ACID-compliant write-optimized storage, and support for incremental updates make it an ideal choice for use cases such as IoT data processing, streaming analytics, event processing, among others. It also allows for the management of large-scale datasets with transactional consistency, making it easy to maintain data integrity and accuracy. On the other hand, Apache Iceberg offers a variety of features to optimize query performance including columnar storage techniques such as predicate push down and schema evolution. It is designed to handle large datasets efficiently by partitioning and organizing data across multiple nodes.
When evaluating performance through benchmarks and real-world use cases, both Apache Hudi and Apache Iceberg have demonstrated their capabilities in handling large-scale datasets effectively. However, they excel in different scenarios based on specific requirements. For instance, Apache Hudi focus on real-time analytics makes it particularly suitable for organizations requiring minute-level analytics with low latency. On the other hand, Apache Iceberg's efficiency at any scale makes it an ideal choice for organizations dealing with massive volumes of diverse data types within their lakehouse environments.
In different scenarios, Apache Hudi offers comprehensive solutions that address the evolving challenges of modern data architectures by providing flexibility, real-time processing, cost-effectiveness, scalability over traditional architectures while ensuring robust management at the record-level within Amazon S3 data lakes. Conversely, Apache Iceberg's strengths lie in its seamless integrations with popular data processing frameworks such as Spark, Trino, PrestoDB, Flink, Hive, among others, offering efficient solutions at any scale while maintaining records of dataset changes over time.
The comparative analysis reveals that both technologies have distinct advantages depending on specific use cases, highlighting the importance of understanding their capabilities in relation to organizational requirements.
Conclusion
Looking ahead, future advancements in Apache Hudi and Apache Iceberg are expected to further enhance their capabilities in managing large-scale datasets within lakehouse environments. Community contributions play a vital role in driving innovation and expanding functionalities across these open-source technologies. As these platforms continue to evolve based on real-world use cases and industry demands, organizations can anticipate even more robust solutions that cater to diverse analytical needs.
In conclusion, while this blog post provides a starting point for evaluating Apache Hudi and Apache Iceberg for your lakehouse architecture needs, it’s important to conduct thorough assessments aligned with your specific use cases. By understanding their unique strengths, limitations, and compatibility with your existing ecosystem, you can make an informed decision that optimally supports your organization’s analytical goals.
Join us in exploring some of the most highly anticipated and prominent features of this new release！This is a major leap forward and we are excited to share these developments with you.
RisingWave has already demonstrated its ability to simplify and accelerate complex workflows in portfolio monitoring and risk management. For engineers in capital markets, adopting RisingWave isn’t just about keeping up—it’s about staying ahead.
RisingWave is a cutting-edge SQL database designed to streamline the processing, analysis, and management of real-time event streaming data. But what sets it apart from other databases? Let’s take a look at the top 12 features, as ranked by our users in a recent survey, that make RisingWave a go-to choice for handling the complexities of real-time data.
